Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2015 15:01:40 GMT
I read it and made my vote.
|
|
|
|
Post by San Diego Padres on Aug 1, 2015 15:35:52 GMT
I'm fine with however we do it. Clevelands idea is very interesting though
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2015 15:46:22 GMT
I don't know if anyone has suggested this, but we could compromise and have Saves and Saves + Holds. That would make Saves 2x as valuable vs. Holds, since they would be counted twice. Somewhere someone commented about how Yahoo may not be able to have holds count as a % like .25 or .50. I think CLE's suggestion here solves this issue. |
|
|
|
Post by Arizona Diamondbacks on Aug 1, 2015 16:16:32 GMT
u can have holds count in %'s but all scoring categories would have to be point based scoring , like 5 points for a homer , 2 points for an rbi .... really don't care for the point based system , but really like Cleveland suggestion . ...... problem solved i say , i also say .....A POLL A POLL , BACK TO THE POLLS!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2015 23:09:57 GMT
I don't know if anyone has suggested this, but we could compromise and have Saves and Saves + Holds. That would make Saves 2x as valuable vs. Holds, since they would be counted twice. +1. Excellent idea. |
|
|
|
Post by Atlanta Braves on Aug 2, 2015 16:25:49 GMT
Mike I like your idea the best with this Holds situation, you helped to clarify the Saves/Holds poll.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 2, 2015 19:03:43 GMT
The trade SD was talking about is Jose Iglesias from me (Cleveland) to SD. SD gives Cleveland $2 million for 2016. Hopefully it isn't too late to put this one through!
|
|
|
|
Post by San Diego Padres on Aug 2, 2015 19:23:29 GMT
i accept that deal and am happy to add iglesias for next year.
|
|
|
|
Post by Colorado Rockies on Aug 2, 2015 21:58:36 GMT
The trade agreement thread is open.
|
|
|
|
Post by Honorary Member on Aug 3, 2015 15:06:13 GMT
I believe there "MUST" be a "League Rule" that states "Statistical Categories" that affect the outcome of performance in this league cannot be changed unless there is a "75% YES VOTE" to do so.
This "POLL" stands at 50/50. If only one of the two remaining members vote for a change to the rule, meaning he votes "YES" to make the change, and the other refuses to vote, then what?
Simple majority should not, and cannot, determine "Rule" changes.
|
|
|
|
Post by Arizona Diamondbacks on Aug 3, 2015 15:08:35 GMT
there is another poll open that i think makes more sense , but i agree with the above statement by texas
|
|
