Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 28, 2020 15:10:41 GMT
So after playing 2020 with 3 matchups per week. How would everybody feel about doing 2 matchups per week on a permanent basis? Teams through the season play two teams/series in a week so it would sort of mirror the MLB. Pros: - We can play more matchups in a year. We can schedule more inter-division games against your division with 38 matchups instead of 19. Right now we play everybody once. We would be able to play everybody once, your division 4 times, your league 2 times.
- You would have 2 matchups per week so you could gain ground faster by winning both matchups.
- More strategy on who to play or who to sit at the end of the week. A player might hurt you in one matchup but help you in the other.
Cons - It might be a little confusing and complicated for some owners. For the new owners, what you do is set your lineup and you will have two matchups under the matchups category.
|
|
|
|
Post by Colorado Rockies on Sept 29, 2020 6:34:33 GMT
I had a hard time following all the matchups this year.
I would prefer a single matchup per week, but I will go along what the majority decides.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 29, 2020 14:12:55 GMT
I did 1 matchup per weak for realism. No strong feelings either way, though
|
|
|
|
Post by Oakland Athletics on Sept 29, 2020 14:46:16 GMT
I liked the way we did it this year although I was unaware we could set different lineups per matchup. If I was already killing someone in saves and could sit a closer for a steals guy or something, I think that would be cool but I look at the lineup and matchups daily anyway.
I don't know if it would be better or worse but I'm up for trying the 2x/wk. I like the multiple division games too because with the tiebreakers it seems that the better team in this situation SHOULD more than likely hold the tiebreaker instead of it just being one random week
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 29, 2020 16:44:47 GMT
I liked the way we did it this year although I was unaware we could set different lineups per matchup. If I was already killing someone in saves and could sit a closer for a steals guy or something, I think that would be cool but I look at the lineup and matchups daily anyway. I don't know if it would be better or worse but I'm up for trying the 2x/wk. I like the multiple division games too because with the tiebreakers it seems that the better team in this situation SHOULD more than likely hold the tiebreaker instead of it just being one random week I didn't know we could set different lineups for each matchup? I thought one lineup for all 3 matchups. We need 75% majority to change the rule so right now it looks like this won't pass. We could look into doing more matchups in the division. I know Fantrax as said that feature will be coming soon when they generate the matchups. We can tell it to create more division matchups. We could do you play your division twice, your league once and then like one year the NL East plays the AL West, the next year the NL East plays the AL East. Rotate each year. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 29, 2020 16:49:41 GMT
I do want to see if we can get more division games. Right now we play 25 weeks of the baseball year. We do not normally play the last week of the season but we can if people want. This year we were just trying to get as many games in as we can. Normally we do a 2 week championship so that would make 26 weeks. We could go down to 1 week as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by Oakland Athletics on Sept 29, 2020 16:55:43 GMT
I liked the way we did it this year although I was unaware we could set different lineups per matchup. If I was already killing someone in saves and could sit a closer for a steals guy or something, I think that would be cool but I look at the lineup and matchups daily anyway. I don't know if it would be better or worse but I'm up for trying the 2x/wk. I like the multiple division games too because with the tiebreakers it seems that the better team in this situation SHOULD more than likely hold the tiebreaker instead of it just being one random week I didn't know we could set different lineups for each matchup? I thought one lineup for all 3 matchups. We need 75% majority to change the rule so right now it looks like this won't pass. We could look into doing more matchups in the division. I know Fantrax as said that feature will be coming soon when they generate the matchups. We can tell it to create more division matchups. We could do you play your division twice, your league once and then like one year the NL East plays the AL West, the next year the NL East plays the AL East. Rotate each year. I must've misread or misinterpreted what you said in another post about the lineup setting then |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 29, 2020 18:15:52 GMT
Oh sorry, I meant that some managers like to bench a pitcher if they are leading in ERA and WHIP and don't want that pitcher to bomb and hurt them and end up losing the match up...but if you play 2-3 matchups, you might need that pitcher in another matchup. But you would just set up one line up.
|
|
